A personal injury case could be resolved by means of a settlement, or in court, by issuance of a jury’s decision. In either case, the victim would need to find a way for paying the mounting medical bills.
Such a victim has options.
Victims ought to keep track of their medical bills. A court does not make a defendant responsible for anything beyond the existing bills. In other words, defendants cannot get charged for ongoing bills.
In a no-fault state, the victim’s bills would be paid by the injured party’s/victim’s own insurance company. Still, the state would have placed a limit on the amount of money that any insurance company could be asked to pay. If the medical charges exceeded that limit, then the injured party would need to utilize an alternative source of funds.
Some victims have a health insurance policy, one that can cover their medical costs, until their case gets resolved. Older victims can count on funds from Medicare or Medicaid. Those funds should cover the difference between the amount of money paid by the insurance company and the amount of money expected by the health care providers.
In the absence of either of the options that were mentioned above, an accident victim that needed to cover medical charges could take 2 actions. First, speak with health care providers, in an effort to arrive at a schedule for repayment of the providers’ bills. Next, file a liability claim against the at-fault driver.
A message from personal injury lawyers
Anyone that has been involved in a car accident ought to give serious thought to retaining a personal injury lawyer in Airdrie. Still keep this in mind; every attorney has the option of refusing a case, if it does not seem like one that the average lawyer could win.
What actions should an accident victim take, in order to increase the chances that a consulted lawyer would take that victim’s case? The most essential action is the one to be taken right at the scene of the collision. All of those who were in the impacted vehicle ought to receive some type of medical examination.
That would deprive any defense attorney of the chance to claim that the plaintiff had failed to mitigate the injuries. Other arguments by the team behind the defendant might center on issues that could be ruled out by introduction of the proper evidence.
For example, were there any pictures of the accident scene? Had any statement been received from a witness? What information could be found in the police report? Any personal injury lawyer that had consulted with someone that had been injured in an on-road collision would want to study that sort of evidence.